Celulares Xiaomi 12 Pro 8GB 256GB 2K AMOLED 120Hz 50MP 120W Quick charge xiaomi mobile phone 5G redmi mobile android phone –

21 reviews for Celulares Xiaomi 12 Pro 8GB 256GB 2K AMOLED 120Hz 50MP 120W Quick charge xiaomi mobile phone 5G redmi mobile android phone –

1. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Clarita Pursell – January 25, 2025

   I put 4 pieces for the goods. Having purchased from the period, the sale is all for $198. Selling, having declared an absolutely new phone, ale there was a Vive of vindnoveny (vindnoveny yakisno, viglyadak Novim). In Mouma eczemplaria, the 1000 cyciv battery I. Dynamiky grayut is not so Jak originalni, Basi do not want to. Such did not seem to be good for those who sold sew up the anchor of the yak’s stitching and did not get stuck on the story. I can’t pass such a person (you can’t for a great cat and don’t make it). You yourself will have to play all the life of the same stitch.
   For all the short, turning $30. For 170 $ I ask you to make a purchase.
   It’s easier to get a story about charging and charging not original. 120W won and see 20-22W))
   Having bought 67W in return, there is a koshtuk nebagato and a phone with a set of charges for 20 hvilin. Dart-free charging for 50W is correct, especially!

2. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Marlen Akhmetov – January 25, 2025

   The seller is a fraud, the phone is not new.
   The back cover has been replaced, it is made of plastic (maybe the screen as well), there were more than 530 charging cycles. The sound of the speakers is terrible, the firmware is not global. The charger does not have 120 watts, in 20 minutes the phone was charged by 25% only. Today, after it was discharged, the phone does not want to turn on, constantly reboots

3. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Eleri Barnes – January 25, 2025

   The phone was sealed with nylon in its box as promised by the seller. When I opened it, I could notice the cell phone is in perfect condition but it is not new, it is reconditioned. The screen is not original so it looks a little bit more opaque than normal compared to other Xiaomi 12 pro without many differences. The speakers are not great quality like the original ones either, but they can be heard super well. The 120W charger is not original but fast charge at about 30W to 50W to be exact. The battery according to battery APK has 3700mah so it takes a little health away from its use and it may not last long if you are demanding. The cameras if they are original and of great quality. It must be borne in mind that this cell phone came out in 2022 2 years ago and new ones in the box do not exist. Shipping arrived super fast in 7 days or less I already had it in my hands. I give 5 stars to the seller because despite being reconditioned they did it with great quality. Cost Me 210 dollars with Aliexpress discounts

4. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Gianmaria De Sario – January 25, 2025

   Doesn’t work in Australia

5. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Maximilien Chopin – January 25, 2025

   scam they send me the faulty phone. it’s dead after 5 minutes and I must say to Ali Express please close these type of store they are deceiving people after a month of wait what I got a faulty device.. shame

6. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Bonnie Montes – January 25, 2025

   The phone arrived poorly restored, and not new as the seller promised in the correspondence. The battery is planted at a third of the declared capacity. The firmware is handicraft, and not global according to the assurances of the seller and not updated, it is not possible to Reask. There are incomprehensible blocs on the cameras. Selfie camera is very soapy. In general, the quality of the photo is clearly worse than the capabilities of this phone, rather all because of the clumpier firmware. Charging is not original, it will give out 30-40 watts from strength and it is not clear how much it will work. The seller is very rude in communication, he did not give any answers at all on the firmware. In the dispute did not compromise.

7. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Finn Junkermann – January 25, 2025

   The phone has a modified firmware with the number os1.0.2.0.ulbmixm. But the correct version name must be os1.0.2.0.ulbeuxm. The battery has 1266 cycles, which indicates serious wear. Fast charging does not work. Complete charging with a complete cord or wireless charging does not include fast or Hiper charging. The bootloader is blocked on the China region. It is impossible to update this phone to the latest firmware

8. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Cindi Mcfarlin – January 25, 2025

   Sorry to sell deceived Daniya smartphone For the sake of the fact that there are no signs for the fact that there are no signs for the original so on the son of the vibliskus on the vibliskus on the side of the city, such as through the Aida 64 Bulo, the battery was inserted 109 the cycle of charging, the metal frame and the slope could not be drawn without a poskozhen at the same time the Type-C port for charging me to Sobi Bagato brood.
   Raju USIM HTO news knowledge rozpakka on video TA vidkrivati Spir with a seller.
   Unfortunately, the seller is deceiving, this smartphone was restored, the back glass, metal frame, and display glass were replaced. I make this assessment based on the fact that the color of the back panel does not respond to the original, so in the sun it does not sparkle with silver stars as in the video reviews, also through Aida 64 it was established that the battery has undergone 109 charging cycles, respectely,

9. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Windy Milnes – January 25, 2025

   The phone was directed by the dovgo. The phone in the factory packaging was sold and the battery was still 1000 a charge and the charge is not original and it is not more than 20 vocha selling, writing a special phone on the 99% of the new, vidiv bend dispute, I will write the result.

10. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Moriya Masanobu – January 25, 2025

    The seller unfortunately indicates an invalid or untrue description, the product name is one thing in the product description, respectively, which product you will receive is unknown.
    I assume that I received a refurbished device, respectively, this was not indicated in the description:
    1) The color of the back panel does not match the original, since in the light it should sparkle with silver stars as in the video reviews.
    2) In aida 64 the capacity is indicated as 4600 mAh, on the screen in the description 5000mAh, the battery is very weak with moderate use for about 4 h, and most importantly charging cycles 1567, which indicates that the battery is in terrible condition.
    3) The 120w charging unit does not look original as it does not give out the specified parameters, for example, the original 67 watt charger gives out the said power.

11. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Devon Huntoon – January 25, 2025

    After almost three weeks of use I can say the battery lasts very well, charges very quickly 22 minutes of 5% to 100% the screens of very good quality all the cell phone seems new except for the battery, powerful I run games in high graphics without problem, ideal for the cold it warms.
    Communication with the seller was exelent answering my doubts and concerns.
    I hope to put a custom rom pixel in the future one time that will let me unlock the botloader.

12. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Rosalie Robertson – January 25, 2025

    The seller is a fraud, the phone is not new.
    The back cover has been replaced, it is made of plastic (maybe the screen as well), there were more than 530 charging cycles. The sound of the speakers is terrible, the firmware is not global. The charger does not have 120 watts, in 20 minutes the phone was charged by 25% only. Today, after it was discharged, the phone does not want to turn on, constantly reboots

13. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Patty Balser – January 25, 2025

    The phone was sealed with nylon in its box as promised by the seller. When I opened it, I could notice the cell phone is in perfect condition but it is not new, it is reconditioned. The screen is not original so it looks a little bit more opaque than normal compared to other Xiaomi 12 pro without many differences. The speakers are not great quality like the original ones either, but they can be heard super well. The 120W charger is not original but fast charge at about 30W to 50W to be exact. The battery according to battery APK has 3700mah so it takes a little health away from its use and it may not last long if you are demanding. The cameras if they are original and of great quality. It must be borne in mind that this cell phone came out in 2022 2 years ago and new ones in the box do not exist. Shipping arrived super fast in 7 days or less I already had it in my hands. I give 5 stars to the seller because despite being reconditioned they did it with great quality. Cost Me 210 dollars with Aliexpress discounts

14. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Olevia Lauder – January 25, 2025

    Doesn’t work in Australia

15. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Maariya Kramer – January 25, 2025

    scam they send me the faulty phone. it’s dead after 5 minutes and I must say to Ali Express please close these type of store they are deceiving people after a month of wait what I got a faulty device.. shame

16. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Jaqueline Phipps – January 25, 2025

    The phone arrived poorly restored, and not new as the seller promised in the correspondence. The battery is planted at a third of the declared capacity. The firmware is handicraft, and not global according to the assurances of the seller and not updated, it is not possible to Reask. There are incomprehensible blocs on the cameras. Selfie camera is very soapy. In general, the quality of the photo is clearly worse than the capabilities of this phone, rather all because of the clumpier firmware. Charging is not original, it will give out 30-40 watts from strength and it is not clear how much it will work. The seller is very rude in communication, he did not give any answers at all on the firmware. In the dispute did not compromise.

17. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Ellie Julius – January 25, 2025

    The phone has a modified firmware with the number os1.0.2.0.ulbmixm. But the correct version name must be os1.0.2.0.ulbeuxm. The battery has 1266 cycles, which indicates serious wear. Fast charging does not work. Complete charging with a complete cord or wireless charging does not include fast or Hiper charging. The bootloader is blocked on the China region. It is impossible to update this phone to the latest firmware

18. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Adella Tarry – January 25, 2025

    Sorry to sell deceived Daniya smartphone For the sake of the fact that there are no signs for the fact that there are no signs for the original so on the son of the vibliskus on the vibliskus on the side of the city, such as through the Aida 64 Bulo, the battery was inserted 109 the cycle of charging, the metal frame and the slope could not be drawn without a poskozhen at the same time the Type-C port for charging me to Sobi Bagato brood.
    Raju USIM HTO news knowledge rozpakka on video TA vidkrivati Spir with a seller.
    Unfortunately, the seller is deceiving, this smartphone was restored, the back glass, metal frame, and display glass were replaced. I make this assessment based on the fact that the color of the back panel does not respond to the original, so in the sun it does not sparkle with silver stars as in the video reviews, also through Aida 64 it was established that the battery has undergone 109 charging cycles, respectely,

19. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Émeric Figuier – January 25, 2025

    The phone was directed by the dovgo. The phone in the factory packaging was sold and the battery was still 1000 a charge and the charge is not original and it is not more than 20 vocha selling, writing a special phone on the 99% of the new, vidiv bend dispute, I will write the result.

20. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Niam Mullins – January 25, 2025

    The seller unfortunately indicates an invalid or untrue description, the product name is one thing in the product description, respectively, which product you will receive is unknown.
    I assume that I received a refurbished device, respectively, this was not indicated in the description:
    1) The color of the back panel does not match the original, since in the light it should sparkle with silver stars as in the video reviews.
    2) In aida 64 the capacity is indicated as 4600 mAh, on the screen in the description 5000mAh, the battery is very weak with moderate use for about 4 h, and most importantly charging cycles 1567, which indicates that the battery is in terrible condition.
    3) The 120w charging unit does not look original as it does not give out the specified parameters, for example, the original 67 watt charger gives out the said power.

21. 

    Rated 5 out of 5

    Lanie Edwin – January 25, 2025

    After almost three weeks of use I can say the battery lasts very well, charges very quickly 22 minutes of 5% to 100% the screens of very good quality all the cell phone seems new except for the battery, powerful I run games in high graphics without problem, ideal for the cold it warms.
    Communication with the seller was exelent answering my doubts and concerns.
    I hope to put a custom rom pixel in the future one time that will let me unlock the botloader.